Memorial Sloan (MSKCC) have a current trial for a neuroblastoma vaccine:
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00911560
The purpose of this study is to test the safety and what effects, good and/or bad, treatment with a vaccine against neuroblastoma has on the patient and the cancer. In the first part of this study we found the highest dose of the vaccine that did not have too many side effects. We are now trying to find out what effects the vaccine has when given at the same dose to all patients.
The main treatment in this protocol is a vaccine. It is called a " bivalent vaccine" which means it has 2 antigens. An antigen is a specific protein on the surface of a cell. The antigens are called GD2L and GD3L.
We want the vaccine to cause the patient’s immune system to make antibodies against the antigens. Antibodies are made by the body to attack cancer (and to fight infections). If the patient can make antibodies against the 2 antigens in the vaccine, those antibodies might also attach to neuroblastoma cells because a lot of each antigen is on neuroblastoma (and very little on other parts of the body). Then, the attached antibodies would attract the patient’s white blood cells to kill the neuroblastoma. This protocol also uses β-glucan which is a kind of sugar from yeast. β-glucan is taken by mouth and can help white blood cells kill cancer. The best way to get the body to make antibodies against the 3 antigens is to link each antigen to a protein called KLH (which stands for: keyhole limpet hemocyanin) and to mix them with a substance called QS-21. But it is hard to get enough QS-21 so we are using an identical substance called OPT-821, which we can get easily in large amounts for use in patients.
The promise of this vaccine is that it is a very simple (and probably not too expensive) treatment with minimal side effects:
Patients receive a total of 7 subcutaneous injections, at weeks 1, 2, 3, 8, 20, 32, and 52. Induction of antibody response against the target antigens will be assessed. A fixed dose of oral β-glucan (40 mg/kg/day) is started at week 6 or 7(to allow time for generation of antibodies), and continued as approximately 2 weeks on, 2 weeks off, up to 1 cycle after the last vaccination. Neutrophils will be tested for glucan effects on cytotoxicity. Antineuroblastoma activity will be monitored using standard radiographic and bone marrow studies, as well as RT-PCR for measurement of minimal residual disease in blood and bone marrow. The treatment schedule may require minor adjustment as clinically indicated or due to unforeseen circumstance (e.g., due to PDH closure for holidays or due to inclement weather).
The MSKCC site says:
https://www.mskcc.org/cancer-care/clinical-trials/05-075
Patients must have high-risk neuroblastoma that is in second remission.
However the document on clinical trials indicates it is:
High-risk NB (as defined above) and now in 1) first CR/VGPR at 6 months from initiation of immunotherapy using anti-GD2 mAbs, or 2) second or subsequent remission. Remission is defined as complete (CR) or very good partial (VGPR)remission, according to the International Neuroblastoma Response Criteria.
Reading through this I am trying to figure out if we (stage 3 MYCN amplified CR) would be eligible or not.
Regardless, some initial data is very promising, and it is something worth exploring:
The study was completed with 15 patients because there was no dose-limiting toxicity at 150 μg/m(2) of OPT-821 (the dosing used in adults). Thirteen of fifteen patients received the entire protocol treatment, including 12 who remain relapse-free at 24+ to 39+ (median 32+) months and 1 who relapsed (single node) at 21 months. Relapse-free survival was 80% ± 10% at 24 months. Vaccine and β-glucan were well tolerated. Twelve of fifteen patients had antibody responses against GD2 and/or GD3. Disappearance of MRD was documented in 6 of 10 patients assessable for response.
This immunotherapy program lacks major toxicity and is transportable to any outpatient clinic. Patient outcome is encouraging but the efficacy is uncertain because of the complexity and heterogeneity of prior therapies. A larger phase II trial is underway.